Official websites use .mil
Secure .mil websites use HTTPS
Illinois
LRL-2019-288 LRL-2018-602 LRL-2018-156 Amended LRL-2018-156 LRL-2017-108 LRL-2017-812 LRL-2017-812 LRL-2006-635 LRL-1961-14-C LRL-2013-907 LRL-2014-5-2 LRL-2011-3
LRL-2011-6
LRL-2012-5-2
LRL-2012-5-3
LRL-2012-5-4
LRL-2013-5-1
Ohio
LRL-2018-642 2016-03-LRD LRL-2014-5-2 LRL-2012-5-4
LRL-2011-3
LRL-2018-988 LRL-2018-1087 LRL-2018-00988 LRL-2019-454 LRL-2018-107 LRL-2016-481 LRL-2015-65 LRL-2018-00071 LRL-2018-446 LRL-1998-01842 LRL-2016-481 LRL-2002-521 LRL-2016-46 LRL-2018-75 LRL-2018-74 LRL-2018-72 LRL-2018-70 LRL-2018-831 LRH-2018-00738 LRL-2018-785 LRL-2018-784 LRL-2018-00073 LRL-2018-00461 LRL-2014-100 LRL-2017-00798 LRL-2017-660 LRL-2017-00028 LRL-2017-632 LRL-2014-408 LRL-2017-1190 LRL-2010-683 LRL-2017-54 LRL-2014-408 LRL-2017-292 LRL-2017-00092 LRL-2017-418
LRL-2013-444b LRL-2015-59 LRL-1976-10045 LRL-2016-00272 LRL-2012-45 LRL-2016-00006 LRL-2016-46 LRL-2016-00006 LRL-2014-798 LRL-2004-324 | LRL-2015-578 LRL-2015-400 LRL-2009-1210-c LRL-2011-6 LRL-2014-648
LRL-2019-930 LRL-1999-289 LRL-2012-24 LRL-2019-444 LRL-2019-835 LRL-2019-404 LRL-2019-444 LRL-2019-282 LRL-2019-764 LRL-2019-749 LRL-2019-752 LRL-2019-769 LRL-2019-513 LRL-2019-496 LRL-1981-65 LRL-2019-328 LRL-2016-1036 (2) LRL-2013-84 LRL-2019-68 LRL-2013-00085 LRL-2018-1040 Extension LRL-2018-1040
LRL-2014-00209 LRL-2018-1102 LRL-1999-289 LRL-2018-632 LRL-2017-724
LRL-2018-691 LRL-2003-1473 LRL-2018-265 LRL-2018-642 LRL-2016-853 LRL-2014-859 LRL-2018-465 LRL-2017-104 LRL-2012-24 LRL-2010-325 LRL-2013-86 LRL-2018-246 LRL-2018-43 LRL-2018-321 LRL-2018-294 LRL-2016-1083 LRL-2017-899 LRL-1962-17 LRL-2017-879 LRL-2017-19 LRL-2014-00500 LRL-1981-90070 LRL-2017-612 LRL-2016-00148 LRL-1976-13 LRL-2017-292 LRL-2006-635 LRL-2017-496 LRL-2017-565 LRL-2017-724 LRL-2017-768 LRL-2017-104 LRL-2017-708 LRL-2013-00143 LRL-1976-10045 LRL-1993-1023 LRL-2017-365 LRL-2015-329 LRL-2017-269 LRL-2017-273 LRL-2017-274 LRL-2016-00006 LRL-2013-00091
LRL-2012-646 LRL-2010-325 LRL-2016-808 LRL-2016-00006 LRL-2005-197 LRL-2015-868 LRL-2015-558-2 LRL-2014-374 LRL-1981-00042 LRL-2004-1506 LRL-2015-785 LRL-2009-358 LRL-2015-684 LRL-2015-225 LRL-2008-642 LRL-2013-83 LRL-2015-645 LRL-2014-664 LRL-2015-558 LRL-2009-127 LRL-2015-282 LRL-2015-417 LRL-2011-707-b LRL-2014-665 LRL-2013-448 LRL-2014-617 LRL-2014-346 LRL-2013-272 LRL-2015-21 LRL-2014-927 LRL-2013-533 LRL-2014-5-2 LRL-2013-739 LRL-2010-323 LRL-2011-3 LRL-2011-6 LRL-2012-5 LRL-2012-5-3 LRL-2012-5-4
On 21 April 2014, the USEPA and the Corps of Engineers (Corps) published for public comment a proposed rule defining the scope of waters protected under the Clean Water Act (CWA), in light of the U.S. Supreme Court cases in U.S. v. Riverside Bayview, Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (SWANCC), and Rapanos v. United States (Rapanos). The proposed rule was developed to enhance protection for the nation’s public health and aquatic resources, and increase CWA program predictability and consistency by increasing clarity as to the scope of “waters of the United States” protected under the Act. This notice is to announce that the comment period has been extended through October 20, 2014. Comments must be received on or before October 20, 2014. The comment period was originally scheduled to end on July 21, 2014. Developing a final rule to provide the intended level of certainty and predictability, and minimizing the number of case-specific determinations, will require significant public involvement and engagement. Such involvement and engagement will allow the agencies to make categorical determinations of jurisdiction, in a manner that is consistent with the scientific body of information before the agencies – particularly on the category of waters known as “other waters.” The agencies propose to define “waters of the United States” in section (a) of the proposed rule for all sections of the CWA to mean: traditional navigable waters; interstate waters, including interstate wetlands; the territorial seas; impoundments of traditional navigable waters, interstate waters, including interstate wetlands, the territorial seas, and tributaries, as defined, of such waters; tributaries, as defined, of traditional navigable waters, interstate waters, or the territorial seas; and adjacent waters, including adjacent wetlands. Waters in these categories would be jurisdictional “waters of the United States” by rule – no additional analysis would be required. The agencies emphasize that the categorical finding of jurisdiction for tributaries and adjacent waters was not based on the mere connection of a water body to downstream waters, but rather a determination that the nexus, alone or in combination with similarly situated waters in the region, is significant based on data, science, the CWA, and case law. In addition, the agencies propose that “other waters” (those not fitting in any of the above categories) could be determined to be “waters of the United States” through a case-specific showing that, either alone or in combination with similarly situated “other waters” in the region, they have a “significant nexus” to a traditional navigable water, interstate water, or the territorial seas. The proposed rule also offers a definition of significant nexus and explains how similarly situated “other waters” in the region should be identified. The agencies propose to exclude specified waters from the definition of “waters of the United States” in section (b) of the proposed rule. The agencies propose no change to the exclusion for waste treatment systems designed consistent with the requirements of the CWA, no change to the exclusion for prior converted cropland, and no change to the regulatory status of water transfers. The agencies propose, for the first time, to exclude by regulation certain waters and features over which the agencies have generally not asserted CWA jurisdiction. Codifying these longstanding practices supports the agencies’ goals of providing greater clarity, certainty, and predictability for the regulated public. Waters and features that are determined to be excluded under section (b) of the proposed rule will not be “recaptured” as jurisdictional waters under any of the categories in the proposed rule under section (a). The agencies’ decision on how best to address jurisdiction over “other waters” in the final rule will be informed by the final version of the EPA’s Office of Research and Development synthesis of published peer-reviewed scientific literature discussing the nature of connectivity and effects of streams and wetlands on downstream waters (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Connectivity of Streams and Wetlands to Downstream Waters: A Review and Synthesis of the Scientific Evidence, (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2013)) (“Report”) and other available scientific information. The goal of the agencies is to ensure the regulatory definition is consistent with the CWA, as interpreted by the Supreme Court, and as supported by science, and to provide maximum clarity to the public, as the agencies work to fulfill the CWA’s objectives and policy to protect water quality, public health, and the environment. National Issues Concerning the Proposed Rule: Similar public notices are being published concurrently by other Corps district offices. The Federal Register notice is the public’s opportunity to provide comment on the proposed rule. For more information on the proposed rule, please visit: http://www.usace.army.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/RegulatoryProgramandPermits/NationalNoticesandProgramInitiatives.aspx. DATES: The comment period is extended through October 20, 2014. Comments must be received on or before October 20, 2014. The comment period was originally scheduled to end on July 21, 2014. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OW–2011–0880 by one of the following methods:
· Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. · E-mail: ow-docket@epa.gov. Include EPA–HQ–OW–2011–0880 in the subject line of the message. · Mail: Send the original and three copies of your comments to: Water Docket, Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Code 2822T, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20460, Attention: Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OW–2011–0880. · Hand Delivery/Courier: Deliver your comments to EPA Docket Center, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20460, Attention Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OW–2011–0880. Such deliveries are accepted only during the Docket’s normal hours of operation, which are 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. Special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information. The telephone number for the Water Docket is 202–566–2426. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Donna Downing, Office of Water (4502–T), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20460; telephone number 202–566–2428; e-mail address: CWAwaters@epa.gov. Ms. Stacey M. Jensen, Regulatory Community of Practice (CECW–CO–R), U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 441 G Street, NW, Washington, DC 20314; telephone number 202–761–5856; email address: USACE_CWA_Rule@usace.army.mil; and include the EPA Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OW-2011-0880 in the subject line of the message.